Response to Kristin Peer Review

Kristin, you have started your post appropriately by defining the peer review concept. Your definition communicates to the reader that you understand the subject of your study and the question relating to the role of peer review. You have written the first paragraph about the concept, which sets the background for the rest of the discussion. I concur with your definition about peer review concept and practice as the process through which experts in a particular field are used to examine, analyze, and review manuscripts before publication (Oberman & Hays, 2019). You have correctly quoted Oberman and Hays (2019) in their description of peer review. Besides the definition, you have discussed in details the role of peer review in scientific research. You have provided a brief historical background of peer review in the 20^th century. I support the need to give a background on the subject.

Kristin, from your post, it is evident that you have critically analyzed the importance of peer review. I agree that peer review provides a system of checks and balances in improving knowledge and research evidence for use in practice (O’Doherty, 2019). You understand the responsibility of peer reviewers and the role of their feedback in improving the publication process. I support your observation that the peer review process improves the quality of the manuscripts set for publication (Smith, Stokes, Marx, & Aitken, 2019). Your response shows that you have performed adequate research on the peer review topic. Besides, you adequately cite quality sources in your response, which is an indication of detailed research. In essence, you have written an informative response to the question of peer review in research.