Peer Feedback Case C

Central Argument

Reading	through	the	case	study
Researching	more	on	the	information
Picking	on	the	important	facts
Deciding	on	the	key	argument
Collating	information	around	the	argument

 

Main Idea 1

The	question	was	the	guide
Team	dynamics	dynamics	in	case
Required	adequate	understanding	on	case
More	research	from	outside	sources
Collating	case	and	research	information

 

Main Idea 2

Defining	the	key	term,	teamwork
Reading	more	on	teamwork	concept
Looking	for	teamwork	in	organization
Drafting	the	ideas	on	paper
Writing	the	final	detailed	section

 

Main Idea 3

Searching	for	effective	leadership	definition
Researching	on	ineffective	leadership	meaning
Comparing	the	two	organizational	concepts
Looking	for	characteristics	in	case
Writing	down	the	final	information

 

Main Idea 4

Developing	understanding	of	leadership	role
Researching	on	the	leadership	role
Investigating	leadership	in	the	case
Looking	into	strengths	and	weaknesses
Writing	the	findings	on	topic

 

 

 

Concluding Thoughts

Reading	through	the	work	done
Pointing	out	the	important	points
Comparing	to	research	on	topic
Summing	up	the	main	ideas
Writing	down	the	concluding	section

 

 

Response

There is a clear articulation of a writer’s ideas. From the beginning of the argument, the writer shows a well-laid out plan for the concepts. From what I have done, I concur with the writer that the discussion takes a process from the start to the end. The writer’s work has a main argument that is clearly stated. As I wrote my discussion, I realized that from the main argument, it is possible to investigate the other main ideas. It is evident that the key concept relates to team dynamics from which it becomes possible to develop the whole paper. The writing shows evidence of an understanding of metacognition, indicating that the writer is knowledgeable about the whole course of writing. Among the most evident ideas in the work is the importance of defining the key concepts before commencing on further discussions.

Besides the definitions of the notions, the writer shows knowledge of research. There is no process of writing that can be done successfully without sourcing ideas from different authors. At the same time, there is evidence of comprehension of the case being studied. Comparing the case to the ideas from outside sources played a major part in successful writing. The process of metacognition effectively indicates the structure of the entire paper. Just like my work, the writer lays out a defined picture of how the work should be structured. It is evident that the work was set in a number of sections, each with a different main idea. The work provided an opportunity to think about the way the initial paper was constructed.

It is not always that the writer takes time to think about what he/she had written. From the student’s work and what I have presented, we took a while to contemplate about the presentation. The writer has indicated the steps and efforts that went into writing the initial work. The presentation by my classmate is impressive, although there is no 5X5 table as required in the instructions. However, there is a great deal of efforts that are evident in the work. From the analysis, is it possible to tell the thinking patterns that went into this presentation. In fact, it is evident that each person takes time to write down ideas that are useful and to come up with convincing facts.